Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3
Just to answer one question back up there . . .

"Until" in 17th c. English does not imply that the event in question ever happened. It was used more like we would use "before". In Numbers 12, Moses is said to have not spoken a falsehood "until the day of his death". That doesn't mean that he started lying on his deathbed! Similarly, Mary and Joseph were chaste "until" the birth of Jesus, thus showing that Christ's birth was miraculous. It doesn't imply that they then ceased living chastely.

93 posted on 10/06/2010 10:53:07 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother

I understand the explaination. I don’t however believe it. Yes it could have meant what you are saying. However, the Bible doesn’t state that she remained a virgin. Common sense would dictate that a man and woman living as husband and wife would have marital relations.
There are too many things to explain away and no direct confirmation that she remained a virgin. It wasn’t sinful for her to have relations with her husband so I am not sure why people have a problem believing that she did.


97 posted on 10/06/2010 11:00:24 AM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson