Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ripliancum
I suggest you read a little more than the anti sites if you wish you know what we actually believe.

Why do you guys keep saying this over and over and over???

How many times do you and yours have to be told that the bulk of us have read LDS MATERIAL, not just "propaganda" and such from so called "Anti" sites?

Repeating it often enough it becomes true? Is that the hope, or just catch the odd lurker unaware?

As it is there are a number of folks here exposing the truth about Mormonism that are former LDS members who studied the same Sunday school and "seminary" lessons you did, from the same material. The majority of the rest of us have copies of Mormon works personally on our shelves or have access LDS.ORG and such for the material we reference.

There are times in the interest of speed or due to some very good scholarship and materials such as charts and illustrations the sites exposing Mormonism "issues" are used in reference, but again since we are familiar with the first source material this second source material stands to the scrutiny in the face of LDS references.

So again, unless it is a trick (safe bet) stop acting as if you are ignorant of this fact.

352 posted on 09/30/2010 9:57:19 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: ejonesie22

I wonder if Ripli is hoping that if he tells that whopper often enough and with enough faux sincerity that readers will swallow the mormon apologist kool-aid?


354 posted on 09/30/2010 10:04:06 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Dems, believing they cannot be deceived, it's nye impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson