[Ripliancum]

Ah, this ol’ canard. This is another example of why I don't like to play the games on these “mormon” threads, it's never ending hashed up stuff.

FYI, it's “at” Jerusalem, not in Jerusalem.

This actually shows it's an ancient record, as opposed to such a glaring error on JS’s part.

Have fun with it all you will, but it's how the ancients viewed the region.

If you still hold this view, then you'll need to throw out the bible too.

2 Kings 14:20
“And they brought him on horses: and he was buried at Jerusalem with his fathers in the city of David.”

[svcw]

Ok, if you go back and take a look an lds poster said Bethlehem, I was pointing out lds teach Jerusalem. And as I pointed out before lds still argue against their own teachings.