Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

Not necessary. I support the candidate that who is:
1. Willing to be an ally of pro-lifers
2. has a reasonable chance of getting elected and defeating the NARAL candidate

I know a former legislator who was a consistent pro-family vote in the state House. Some pro-life activists met him in town, discovered he was not a serious pro-lifer and organized against him. His NARAL opponent won.

Bottom line: if you’re in politics, you have to be able to distinguish between your allies and adversaries.


15 posted on 09/22/2010 6:50:04 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: campaignPete R-CT

“Bottom line: if you’re in politics, you have to be able to distinguish between your allies and adversaries.”

I agree, but I think the more important message is to get Catholics (and other voters whose religion dictates they should hold a similar position) to stop thinking they can freely support pro-abortion politicians. Appealing to them to be consistent with their faith, if successful, might lose a few races, but it could win a whole heck of a lot more.


16 posted on 09/22/2010 7:31:52 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson