Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity

“Selling celebrity pope plates and tee shirts while condeming celebrity worship is just a tad hyprocrital.”

Not at all. Not even a little. Not the slightest scintilla or iota.

After reading note 1, I started to write a reply to the effect that people don’t seem to understand what hypocrisy is any more. Your next note made me think that even people who do seem to know what it is will often reach to any extreme in an attempt to infer it where it doesn’t exist. After all, any old stick is good enough to beat the Pope with.

To make your argument you had first to call these souvenirs “celebrity” items, which is as arbitrary as it is unreasonable.

The word “celebrity,” as we are using it here, does not mean “any person who is well known.” It means “people who are well known for trivial or meaningless pursuits, or for nothing more than being well known. “Famous for being famous,” like Paris Hilton.

Mother Theresa is quite well known, but she was never a celebrity. Or, for the more whacked-out among us, consider Ghandi. It would be an insult to denigrate him as a mere celebrity. I’m sure the leftards would be outraged if one said of Kamarade FDRsky that he was only a celebrity.

Far less even than these people is the Holy Father “famous for being famous.” His duties are hardly trivial or meaningless, nor were the duties whose successful execution brought him to the Throne of Saint Peter.

It is hypocritical in no regard for a man well known for his involvement in weighty, solemn matters to criticize air-headed twerps for lionizing celebrities known only for their success at sports, trivial entertainment, and sexual depravity.

It is a tradition of long standing for the faithful to want and treasure souvenirs of a Papal visit. The availability of such souvenirs trivializes neither the Holy Father’s mission nor the veneration of the faithful.


12 posted on 09/17/2010 12:57:41 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: dsc
The word “celebrity,” as we are using it here, does not mean “any person who is well known.” It means “people who are well known for trivial or meaningless pursuits, or for nothing more than being well known."

No it doesn't. Celebrity means a person who is widely known. You adding your own special defintion to avoid the obvious hypocrisy doesn't change reality. Although I can see why you would want to try.

13 posted on 09/17/2010 1:02:17 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: dsc; circlecity
It is a tradition of long standing for the faithful to want and treasure souvenirs of a Papal visit. The availability of such souvenirs trivializes neither the Holy Father’s mission nor the veneration of the faithful.

To encourage them to change their image of the pope, Ms. Whitis pulled out souvenirs from her 1993 trip to Denver, to see the pope at World Youth Day. She dressed Adam House in the T-shirt and shorts she wore. She put her admission tag around his neck, complete with the cross a man from Spain gave her and buttons she swapped with people from other countries.

Then she pulled out the foam miter, commonly called “the pope hat,” and placed it on Adam's head. “You weren't cool unless you got a pope hat,” Ms. Whitis said.

-- from the 1999 Cincinnati Enquirer article Teacher pulls kids into pope


15 posted on 09/17/2010 1:39:59 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson