Although it's also been stated in the RCC catechism and posted dozens of times.
It doesn't take much to realize how that licentious, blasphemous title could result in abuse.
You argue like a liberal. It's not my responsibility to show evidence to support your ugly charges. I didn't make them. You did. You do understand the concept of "burden of proof," don't you?
I'm content to post, read and understand the writings of a well-respected Roman Catholic priest who teaches us that he and all Roman Catholic priests are "another Christ in their public as well as private lives."
Nothing in what you posted said a single word about a priest having some sort of right to any illicit pleasure, whether sexual or any other kind.
Although it's also been stated in the RCC catechism and posted dozens of times.
The catechism doesn't back up your claim any more than Fr. Baker does. If you think it does, post the citation.