Dangit!
Now I am confused and got no quarrel with you ever.
I take your point about the innocents but, as the article came from Salt Lake, I felt the last two paragraphs were biased in saying the Mormons were once put upon and now have joined Catholicism or Judaism as mainstream blah, blah, blah.
And using 911 to make the point.
It was just unnecessary.
:)
I know. I get more flak from my family members than from Inmans. (And I was hopin' there'd be more "family" like you who'd give me flak...you've been my only hope thus far...:) )
but, as the article came from Salt Lake, I felt the last two paragraphs were biased in saying the Mormons were once put upon and now have joined Catholicism or Judaism as mainstream blah, blah, blah. And using 911 to make the point. It was just unnecessary.
Well, now you're makin' sense...and untanglin' my confusion. Yeah, I didn't fully agree w/his last graph, either -- on exactly the same conclusion as you.
The other part, tho, of the way he argued makes it an interesting point of consistency: And that is, if you're going to take umbrage @ Muslim terrorist violence forever & a day, then why the "free pass" given to Mormons? I mean, obviously, terrorist thugs using their religious badge to massacre men, women, and children...of course, that should be highly provocative and held in remembrance! Well, Utah had a "Ground Zero," too...one not honored by the Mormon church who owns the property.
And, unlike, the millions of $ our govt has spent in trying to track down Bin Laden & other killers, the Utah territorial govt spent more $ trying to cover up the terrorist massacre in its midst than trying to uncover these execution-style crimes upon the innocent.