Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Pyro7480; RnMomof7

“So, by default, Catholics aren’t serious scriptural scholars, in your opinion.”

.
The roman Catholic Church is caught up in seeking justification for their completely unscriptural deification of Mary, and use practically every mention of a woman toward that end.

It is very clear that the term “Woman” in Genesis refers to Israel, and the parallels throughout the rest of scriptures mesh perfectly with that understandsing.

Mary is of no particular importance in scripture beyond her carrying of the child into the world. Subsequent to that, she became the epitome of the average Jewish woman, including the bearing of at least five, and more likely seven additional children. There is no mention of Mary whatsoever after Pentecost, as her job had been completed.
.


9 posted on 09/07/2010 12:42:02 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
The roman Catholic Church is caught up in seeking justification for their completely unscriptural deification of Mary

Straw man alert! Neither Catholic nor Orthodox believe that Mary is a "goddess," contrary to the longstanding claim of too many "Reformed" Christians.

10 posted on 09/07/2010 12:43:44 PM PDT by Pyro7480 ("If you know how not to pray, take Joseph as your master, and you will not go astray." - St. Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

Yet, despite the fact that she’s “of no particular importance beyond carrying her child into the world” the Holy Spirit wanted Mary to experience the Pentecost. Surely she is more important than you say. Why does the Holy Spirit mention her by name as a member in the room? This one fact makes her more important than you stated. Now add in all the other things we know, through Holy Spirit inspired Scripture, about Mary. She matters a great deal.

Mary is a stumbling block for so many. She is foreshadowed in the Old Testament: see Ex 25: 10-16 and Luke 1: 38-41, 56.

Mary had no other children. Brothers is a word also used for cousins. In Acts 1: 12-15 we see that J. had over 100 “brothers.” Four men are named as “brothers of the Lord” but we know that two of them (James and Joseph) were actually sons of Mary, the wife of Cleophas (Mt. 27:56, John 19: 25). In Genesis 29:15 Laban calls his uncle Jacob his “brother.” This is a common usage of the word for relatives. In John 20: 17-18, we see that “brethren” is used to mean disciples.

It’s really an illogical stretch, when one considers all these facts, to insist that Jesus had brothers who were sons of his mother Mary.

I see Mary as the Abraham of the New Testament.


71 posted on 09/09/2010 9:50:16 PM PDT by Melian ("There is only one tragedy in the end, not to have been a saint." ~L. Bloy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson