IF SO, please let me know what you know, on this thread, here--not trying to intrude such a discussion on this thread.
Here:
Hmmm....Isn’t Lawrence Auster a white supremicist?
lol. No, Auster is not a “white supremacist.”
Typical killing of the messenger (although apparently most who target Auster are socialists.)
I’d never heard of him until he came up on google. His quotes in my post were 100% accurate.
Well, as long as he is anti-Catholic he can't be all bad.
“Hmmm....Isn’t Lawrence Auster a white supremicist?”
No, no of course not. He just is an example of Calvanist thought I guess.
From Auster:
“My mother told me that before she married my father, he told her that he would always have to take care of his brother. In fact, my uncle was of very limited intelligence, perhaps even borderline retarded, but it wasn’t something you automatically noticed because of the way he carried himself, his almost kingly manner and leonine appearance.
As I thought about my uncle in this light, I began to see through the “optical illusion” of racial equality. I realized how in ordinary interactions and behavior blacks seem on the whole like ourselves, indeed, often more vital than ourselves, with warm and vivid personalities, so we assume that any intellectual differences must be insignificant. It is only when we go beyond superficial contact and get to know them better, or when we observe them in a position requiring intelligence, that we see that, much more often than whites or Asians, they are unable to deal with more rigorous tasks. In undemanding, routine affairs they are, more or less, intellectually equal to whites. In more demanding settings they are not.”
OY GEVELT!
IF SO, please let me know what you know, on this thread, here--not trying to intrude such a discussion on this thread.
Here: