[Mad Dawg]

.And, it says their high quality RC education was equal to used toilet paper.

And, it implies that they didn’t have the horse sense to learn even their ABC’s from whatever quality of RC education they are ‘pretending’ to have had.

GRRRRRR.

What tripe.

Okay. So when somebody says something that is not true, easily shown to be false, but claims authority on these matters of fact, NOT opinion, NOT doctrine, FACT, because of their training and experience, what would you have me say about their claim of authority?

Am I supposed to just fold up and go away because somebody who clearly doesn't know what he's talking about once used to be a member of my Church? Am I supposed to agree that there are no married priests, that the Church teaches ev3eryone to expect the appearance and accidents of flesh and blood, that the Church withholds the chalice, though I know these things to be false?

How do you know how good their training was? On what basis do you say they had a "high quality RC education"?

Bed for me.

[Dr. Eckleburg]

Are you able to grasp that someone disagreeing with you is not the same thing as someone not understanding you?

[stfassisi]

Very good post.

Bless you ,dear broter