I see that
1. you seem to presume to be my editor and style coach.
2. you have very different standards of what is “inflammatory.”
3. you will likely never understand my perspective nor my standards of communications.
4. you seem to excuse similar “inflammatory” communicationis from RC’s.
The discussion of guidelines and the scale of inflammatory was in play and part of the and your discussion. So, I believe I'm within bounds as far as our discussion.
you have very different standards of what is “inflammatory.”
I think that's clear now, though I'd hoped you would be able to see it. My point was the same thing can be communicated in ways that seek to increase or decrease their agitation.
Fanning the flames, intentional provocation, finding the most offensive ways to communicate a point are in the wrong direction of both the forum guidelines and adult discussion and debate. This is part of the standard I would use to measure "inflammatory" on this forum.
you seem to excuse similar “inflammatory” communicationis from RC’s.
The worst I've seen are conscious attempts to mimic yours. I oppose both, but I believe if the original is cured, the mimic will disappear as well.
Thanks for your reply.