Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: smvoice

So? The concept seems to have blown right by you. What a shame.


213 posted on 08/07/2010 9:37:53 PM PDT by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: narses

That’s not the actual shame, narses. The actual shame is evidently ignoring God’s Word if it doesn’t mention Peter. And believing that Jesus Christ spoke no more after He spoke to Peter. Even if you just follow the “red words” in your Bible they should be there, after Peter, in Acts, Chapter 9. He spoke to someone else after He spoke to Peter. That concept seems to have blown right by you. And that is a true shame.


216 posted on 08/07/2010 9:42:40 PM PDT by smvoice (smvoice- formally known as small voice in the wilderness. Easier on the typing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson