Specific people? (Yeah, I understand the very reluctance to even go there in thought or contemplation). But generically?...like people groups at home & abroad? If all the missionaries & missionary agencies & those who support them took your word above as "gospel" on that, might as well call 'em all back home -- if it doesn't matter if a group of people has plenty of "lost" people in its midst.
That's almost like saying "why care about the effects of broken homes upon children? Why should we have social science theories & studies which enjoins or advocates the public contemplation of other people's divorces?" 'Tis a HUGE difference between over-navelgazing your nextdoor neighbor goin' thru a divorce -- and social scientists taking a broader look at the impact of divorce upon children...like some of what Judith Wallerstein has done thru the years.
This parallel example can also be applied to missionaries & intercessors who study people groups around the world. (So yes, Wayne, millions of Christians worldwide do indeed "contemplate the salvation" at least of groups of people -- and they lift them up in prayer daily.)
My bottom-line assessment of your comment: This is simply screwed up libertarian theology taken to its max...where "loving thy neighbor" becomes "who cares about thy neighbor?"
The thread was started in order to induce people to contemplate the salvation status of a specific person.
I made my comments in the context of the thread.