To: esquirette
May we agree to characterize this entity as the Roman Catholic Church, on this thread, in light of the usage by the author? I personally wouldn't (just a IMHO here). I would think that it would include all particular churches that teach the apostolic faith and have valid apostolic succession.
An example of this would have to include the Eastern Orthodox churces. They are a historically significant part of the Church Catholic. They are absolutely legitimate churches as they maintain apostolic succession and they teach the orthodox (small "O") Faith as passed down from the apostles.
4 posted on
08/02/2010 4:08:30 AM PDT by
markomalley
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: markomalley
That is why I am very careful not to you the word “orthodox” until the Eastern Christian churches come home in full to the Roman Catholic Church.
8 posted on
08/02/2010 4:30:56 AM PDT by
Biggirl
(AZ Is DOING THE JOB The Feds Should Be Doing, ENFORCING The Southern Border! =^..^=)
To: markomalley
11 posted on
08/02/2010 4:37:21 AM PDT by
esquirette
("Our hearts are restless until they find rest in Thee." ~ Augustine)
To: markomalley
An example of this would have to include the Eastern Orthodox churces. They are a historically significant part of the Church Catholic. They are absolutely legitimate churches as they maintain apostolic succession and they teach the orthodox (small "O") Faith as passed down from the apostles. But we converts to Holy Orthodoxy swam the Bosporus. When I heard that a Bishop in the OCA (Dmetri - Orthodox Church in America) had been raised a Baptist, I had to take a serious look. Then I found out about Peter Gillquist and his cohorts.
13 posted on
08/02/2010 4:38:51 AM PDT by
don-o
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson