However, on an ecumenical RF thread, a remark that another poster's Diety used a privy, might be "antagonistic" depending on the context and the reaction.
>>However, on an ecumenical RF thread, a remark that another poster’s Diety used a privy, might be “antagonistic” depending on the context and the reaction.<<
Well, actually I was referring to Jesus in the Bible.
John 1:14-18 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us.
So if another poster is speaking of a Jesus that did not become flesh, maybe he/she should make that clear. I never clarified it with “your Jesus” or “my Jesus”, I just said Jesus. As I remember, that poster doesn’t name his Diety as Jesus. So maybe we are talking about two different Dieties.
If the reaction of a word is the criteria, which borders on “niggardly”, then I retracted the “privy” statement anyway and asked if Jesus got dressed.
But I guess if that poster’s Diety didn’t become Flesh, I’m sure he didn’t get dressed either.