Posted on 07/27/2010 12:02:18 PM PDT by T Minus Four
So, young single adults ... have you ever been in a ward you didn't like? The chemistry was off? Didn't connect with your quorum? Not enough hotties? Too few mingles?
Well, what did you do about it?
If your answer is, "I served others, fulfilled my calling, loved the congregation and tried harder," then kudos. Good work.
If your answer is, "I up and left," then you're a ward hopper and we need to talk.
The costs of jumping ship
It may seem like a small thing to go to a fresh ward each Sunday after all, you're still going to church. But Charles Schwab, who was recently released from his position as a young single adult ward bishop in Salt Lake City, says that if everyone gave each ward in their area a trial run, the church couldn't function, and lives couldn't be blessed.
"What would happen if everybody had to be in the 'top' ward?" Schwab asked. "Then what happens to all the other wards?"
The fact is that members can't fully participate in the edifying experience that is church membership if they don't regularly attend the ward to which they're assigned, he said, and they can't serve others or be served.
"If I don't have their church membership, then they don't get a calling. So they miss out on the whole sanctifying experience," said Schwab, who teaches institute at the University of Utah. "They can't pay their tithing to me. ... They can't come in for an interview. They can't go through the repentance process. I can't give them a temple recommend."
(Excerpt) Read more at mormontimes.com ...
They can't pay their tithing to me. ... They can't come in for an interview. They can't go through the repentance process.
I can't give them a temple recommend."
I can tithe just fine to my Lord and Savior without having to pay directly to a “bishop”...
I’m not Mormon, but I can attest to what happens when a single guy doesn’t find “the right one” at his church, while being very active there. You never get to other churches to find a decent Christian girl who is still single because you don’t find such a person at the church you are so active at.
I loved my church involvement and I grew through it, but honestly, the idea that one should stay at the place they were before simply because it’s good to “grow yourself” where you are, is wrong.
I fervently believe the person suggesting singles “stay behind” is married and has therefore hasn’t a clue what he is saying.
I’m now married to a great Christian lady, but I had to go elsewhere to find her.
The LDS draw physical bounaries and you are compelled to attend that “ward” (neighborhood church).
They can change the boundaries at will and you must change when they say change, even if you are satisfied and have roots.
“Growing yourself” is a very different thing for the LDS than for Christians. The “no temple recommend” is incredibly serious and will have enormous impact on your afterlife.
Wow, nothing like laying the guilt trip on thick here.
“Just forget about your personal happiness or spiritual needs, the collective is your priority.”
In my experience, the “permanent” assignment of wards through ward boundaries is one aspect of the control the LdS maintain over their membership and many “happily” accept it. And the article goes to some length in affirming that.
I’ve discussed this ward boundary thing before.
But telling a young single adult to forego their search for marital happiness or find a “spiritual home” and focus on the needs of the ward first and foremost is incredulous.
Not surprising in the least considering that amount of control the individuals allow the church to maintain over them through policies such as the “ward boundary”.
On the subject of church hopping (Mormon or otherwise): Some people never settle down in one place. They are forever dissatisfied and always finding fault with the place they are attending. It probably extends to other areas of life, as well.
As to spouse shopping: some may find it wrong, but I figure if you’re not out to just get laid, but find someone to marry, then you’re probably doing OK by everyone, including the Lord.
But...but...how can lives be blessed? /sarc
Afterward, he or one of his counselors would ask the visitor if he or she planned on moving in. When the answer was a predictable 'I'm not sure,' Bishop Schwab would ask him or her to leave, which was always followed by defensiveness.
"If they're mad at you for enforcing the rules, you know where their heart is," he said.
Can you even IMAGINE this happening in a Christian Church?
Although unfortunate, that should be an individual choice. These people are being told their heavenly destination depends upon staying in their assigned church.
What do you think would be the attitude of the various ward leaders toward that?
Some locations have enough participation/membership to create a “singles ward”, others don’t.
That being said, I’ve heard of dances, activities, etc. taking place for folks to interact that are “sanctioned” by the stake the wards are in.
But, the ward boundary is designed in such a way to mandate/dictate compulsory attendance in a certain location.
So if Molly mormon wants to visit with Levi mormon, it needs to be an irregular practice so as not to raise suspicion about their non-attendance or their attendance at their respective wards.
As an ex-mo, I’m quite familiar with many of the practices, but the point of this article has taken it to a whole new level for me. I’ve not heard of a bishop confronting a “visitor” and then telling them to leave.
"I've not heard of a bishop confronting a "visitor" who is a member and then telling them to leave under the circumstances described in this article"
I just clicked on the Mormon Times Link and then looked at the whole website. Neat stuff here. Check out: http://www.mormontimes.com/
With such good stuff there in the articles, it seems a little strange that someone would publish for FR readers just the one article that the Mormon Haters could jump on to get Mormons to leave their faith.
I appreciate the link, however, it’s lost on me.
As an ex-mo currently married to an active mormon, we get the MT delivered. I read through it once in a while.
Sure, it’s neat, sure they use a lot of the same words Christians do, but the words have significantly different meanings between mormonism and Christianity.
I guess I could be classified as a “mormon hater” since I do post against the religion that is mormonISM if that is how you choose to identify folks.
What is being discussed is the level of control that mormons are subjected to in practicing their faith. I find the fact that a mormon is highly discouraged to the point of being disciplined for “ward hopping” or denied a temple recommend because they are looking for a place to fit in or a mate to be highly troublesome.
Granted, it is their choice to subjugate themselves, but it is hoped that any who are lurking or perform a google or web search for information on mormonISM will get these posts as results in their searches and get alternate viewpoints, not just an apologist’s pov.
I’ve written about this subject previously and the negative impact it has had on my wife and son who attend LdS services.
I couldn't even begin to tell you. I'm a Christian. I'm free to worship where I please, where the Lord leads me.
That torqued my jaw too. You'll find a much different attitude "on the outside". Or should I say "on the inside" :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.