Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: marshmallow

To cut to the chase on this: Rand’s philosophy cannot withstand the moral implications of something as simple and natural as having and raising children.


25 posted on 07/20/2010 7:34:04 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

Sure it can stand the having and raising of children, unless you don’t love them i guess,,,,
You are making a common mistake. She was only against people being forced into service against their will. She would be against forced abortions in China, and against Lebensborn projects in Germany. Never saw anything where she was against a person who wanted children with someone they loved.


29 posted on 07/20/2010 7:45:20 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb
To cut to the chase on this: Rand’s philosophy cannot withstand the moral implications of something as simple and natural as having and raising children...

...thereby proving your unfamiliarity with her works.

70 posted on 07/20/2010 9:37:38 AM PDT by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson