So apparently the good doctor wants to avoid the point that his argument and Bible texts work as well against him as for him.
"Scripture is the word of God; truth made known to men by the Holy Spirit. Scripture does not contradict itself. Men's beliefs and practices either align with Scripture or they contradict Scripture."
Invoking Scripture as if it applied uniquely to your position when it could equally support your opponent is either disingenuous or stupid.
"And welcome to Free Republic, newbie."
As if that has any value in defending your position.
I'm leaning toward disingenuous only because I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt for actually being bright enough to be a doctor. Feel free to prove me wrong.
Dr. E is neither bright nor a doctor.
I'm leaning toward disingenuous only because I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt for actually being bright enough to be a doctor. Feel free to prove me wrong.
When a religion takes on the tendancies and characteristics of that religion in Matt. 23, as yours does, it's pretty clear biblically that those verses posted by the good Doctor are directed at that religion and those of the same ilk...
You can wallow in the mud and claim you're clean, but......