As mentioned prior I do not get caught up in that which catholics feel significant to a mans testimony..and which generally generate division and discord. Rather this former Priests Testimony is very clear that He is no longer bound to the catholic faith, Pope, nor their requirements of Him. Rather he, after careful time and study of the scriptures, over many years, determined what he was practicing as a Priest in the catholic church, was not in accordance with the teachings of scripture.....thereafter He gave His life to Christ and is currently in the work Christ has called Him to.
Why would He feel the need to “straighten himself out” as it is quite apparent he was doing just that.
You have stated “something is wrong here” when in reality it is a hard thing for any catholic to believe this mans testimony. You say you “don't know what it is” but some will continue to dig until they find something. You say you “don't know the man”.......And so in brief you don't know what's wrong, you don't know what it is, and you don't know the man.
But you see This former Priest knew something was wrong and found out what it was...and He discovered the man Christ wanted Him to be from His written word....
.....The “Proof” He was looking for He found....”The sufficiency of Christ and Christ alone”.
I see. You don't care what Catholics say. And you don't care if Bennett's assertions are true or not. And no standard of prove actually matters. You're going to stick to your conclusion regardless. That's not how thinking works.
What again is the point of discussing this with you?