Where do you think that she has lied besides here? How about some specifics? Can you PROVE it?
Why do you think she's lying here? You don't believe that she has Catholic relatives or has attended Catholic masses? On what basis?
And how would you expect her to establish credibility? Would she have to meet some arbitrary standard of proof that you set up?
Can we accuse you of lying too, if we don't like what you say or claim that you've lied about Protestants in the past, thus claiming that you've established a history of lying??
Where do you think that she has lied besides here? How about some specifics? Can you PROVE it?
Why do you think she’s lying here? You don’t believe that she has Catholic relatives or has attended Catholic masses? On what basis?
And how would you expect her to establish credibility? Would she have to meet some arbitrary standard of proof that you set up?
Can we accuse you of lying too, if we don’t like what you say or claim that you’ve lied about Protestants in the past, thus claiming that you’ve established a history of lying??
INDEED.
And what is this wailing about the show-trial type excommunication of the Canadian Convent for Maryolatry?
Of course it’s good to deal with some of the most outrageous and most public examples of such.
However, it doesn’t BEGIN to touch the
INSTITUTION WIDE encouragements of same; winking at same; rewarding of same etc. . . .
As Ferraro’s book documents many times over.
Why not, you have lied on my behalf today already. (The RM isn't going to like that but you introduced the term and anyone can check this thread to verify it.) What difference does the truth make now.
Besides, I doubt there is anything that is going to rehabilitate Dr. E's credibility as long as her posting history is still accessible.