That obvious statement being made, his account is full of holes.
There is no Dominican foundation in Tallaght.
He claims to have been a Dominican, but he incorrectly identifies Dominicans as monks.
He claims that his thesis advisor invited him to plagiarize, apparently not realizing that the Angelicum requires candidates to defend their thesis through a lengthy verbal examination administered by multiple professors.
He claims that he was a Dominican but does not seem to realize that a Dominican would not be answerable to a diocesan ordinary as he claims, in the article, but to a provincial superior. All this is just for starters. None of it adds up.
Liars lie.