[Houghton M.]

Of course it contains facts.

The problem is that its thesis (that Ratzinger/Benedict is culpable) is not supported by the facts cited.

It’s a trash article.

And anyone with any dose of objective critical analysis skills could see that at first reading.

Had enough of them (de)merits yet?

[wagglebee]

I’ve always been amused by the fact that people who don’t trust the New York Times for ANYTHING ELSE are willing to accept ANYTHING the NYT prints that supports their anti-Catholic agenda.