Not quite, Alexander VI didn’t teach any theology as far as I know, Calvinism is built on Calvin’s theology.
Alexander VI was too busy ignoring the rule of celibacy and fathering children: four with one mistress; and three others with women who were unknown.
And were here condeming Calvin because he was punished by the Catholic Church for the sin of sodomy?
The point of the thread was about the character of the man.
Calvin pales in comparison to Alexander VI.
Besides, as pope, he was allegedly Christ’s representative on earth and so was in charge of the Roman Catholic Church theology, so he would have been ultimately responsible for the teaching of theology so that argument is a bit weak.
For all the visibility that Calvinists have on FR, I’ve met very few in real life. Most Protestant churches hold to doctrine that is more Arminian in nature, which also played a role in the Reformation but is virtually ignored in these debates.
The Reformation and Protestantism are not strictly Calvinistic by any means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arminianism