Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RegulatorCountry
And I suppose those obedient little 'bots who didn't separate themselves from the abject corruption and sin that was the Roman hierarchy in the 16th century could always be said to be just following orders.

What orders are you imagining now?

That excuse didn't cut it at Nuremberg, IIRC.

Exactly. That's why Calvin is guilty - not because he learned it, but because he did it.

146 posted on 06/27/2010 5:51:50 PM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: Titanites
Exactly. That's why Calvin is guilty - not because he learned it, but because he did it.

OK, let's extend that to every example of the behavior and the leadership that was responsible.

How many popes are guilty, then? Excluding the one that was dug up, put on trial, declared a posthumous heretic and dumped in the Tiber by the abject nutbag that succeeded him as pope, of course.

Is Pope Formosus now regarded as legitimate, or an "anti-Pope," by the way? How about his successor? What does that do to claims of Apostolic succession? Chucks it in the Tiber, just like Formosus, that's what it does.

150 posted on 06/27/2010 6:05:41 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson