To: wagglebee; sabe@q.com; metmom; Natural Law
YOU were the one who brought up Alexander VI and I don't think there is anything in my post that can be construed as defending him. And yet, per the Catholic Church's own proclamations, if Alexander VI did decree ex-cathedra dogmas, you would still be bound today to obey them. The whole inerrant, infallible and Holy Spirit empowered role of the pope. Am I wrong? Who elected this guy anyway???
114 posted on
06/27/2010 2:57:03 PM PDT by
boatbums
(God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
To: boatbums; sabe@q.com; metmom; Natural Law
And yet, per the Catholic Church's own proclamations, if Alexander VI did decree ex-cathedra dogmas, you would still be bound today to obey them. But he DIDN'T.
The whole inerrant, infallible and Holy Spirit empowered role of the pope.
Infallibility PROTECTS the popes from teaching error, Alexander VI is a PERFECT example of that.
117 posted on
06/27/2010 2:59:49 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson