[Guyin4Os]

When you disagree with someone on a viewpoint, it is expedient that you first learn what that viewpoint is. Understanding comes first. Disagreement comes later. Therefore I would encourage you to learn the millennial view so that you won't argue against a mischaracterization of it.

Example: Going by your thoughts, the dead ones raised for judgment will be ruled for 1,000 years by Jesus.

I don't know anyone who believes this.

[Ken4TA]

Example: Going by your thoughts, the dead ones raised for judgment will be ruled for 1,000 years by Jesus.

Sorry, I mispoke there. That's what I get for not reviewing what I wrote and hit the "already previewed" box and then "post" - bad decision. It was supposed to be the "dead ones raised for rewards will be ruled for 1,000 years by Jesus" - with a "rod of iron"? Why? They are saved, are they not? And where do you find what goes on in this 1,000 year period in the Bible? There are many more questions that could be asked of the dispensational and pre-millennial viewpoints.

[Ken4TA]

When you disagree with someone on a viewpoint, it is expedient that you first learn what that viewpoint is. Understanding comes first. Disagreement comes later.

And do you really understand my viewpoint?