Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr
Paul's Revelations from Jesus Christ were to *him alone*. Just like John's Revelation was to *him alone*. *Two or three witnesses* refers to every word being *established*. It *clearly* says this in Matt.18:16 and 2 Cor. 13:1.

Don't start this again.

Attempting to twist the clear words and understanding is an effort in futility.

2,025 posted on 06/26/2010 6:58:28 AM PDT by small voice in the wilderness ( DEFENDING the INDEFENSIBLE: The PRIDE of a PAWN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2017 | View Replies ]


To: small voice in the wilderness
Paul's Revelations from Jesus Christ were to *him alone*. Just like John's Revelation was to *him alone*.

Then why did John chronicle his Revelation and Paul did not? Why were they treated so differently? Why did Luke not even get it correct in the two passages of Acts 2 and Acts 9 which are the description of the moment of Paul's conversion?

Two or three witnesses* refers to every word being *established*. It *clearly* says this in Matt.18:16 and 2 Cor. 13:1.

The two or three witnesses cannot be the Triune God - they refer to human beings confronting another. And if it were the Triune God, I would not need the Father, the Son AND the Holy Spirit showing up to witness to me. This is a rather crazy line of thought but innovative, I must say.

Attempting to twist the clear words and understanding is an effort in futility.

Exactly. My advice is for you to abandon your novelties and head on over to Christianity. The Bible and the Catechism are pretty good documents to follow.

2,054 posted on 06/26/2010 4:31:27 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2025 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson