Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rstrahan; Irisshlass; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
rstrahan says:
Honestly, if you look at the history of priestly celebacy (not the Church version, but historical) you will see that this was created to generate wealth for the Church. You had priests from nobility coming into the Church, and would be in line to inherit. By pushing for celebacy, the line would die out with the priest and the Church would claim the land.
What odd "history" book taught you this?
12 posted on 05/30/2010 7:36:19 AM PDT by narses ( 'Prefer nothing to the love of Christ.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: narses
What odd "history" book taught you this?

Probably the writings of Maria Monk or Loraine Boettner.

23 posted on 05/30/2010 9:14:09 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: narses

“You had priests from nobility coming into the Church, and would be in line to inherit.”

Speaking of nonsense...

Ever hear of primogeniture? First sons inherited titles and treasure; sons not in line for titles went into the Church.

And don’t even try to claim that if the first sons were died or were killed, priest sons would inherit. The first thing heirs did was beget their own heirs, often even before inheriting themselves.


29 posted on 05/30/2010 11:50:11 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson