Whoa.. so your a Bible scholar! Any real Christian understands that the Old Testament Jews were ‘God’s people’ and therefore His ‘ekklasia’. Actually the Old Testament even refers to ‘the Church in the Wilderness’ (proof text on demand)
You are (may I say ‘typically’ for Roman apologists) dancing all around to answer the question I have now clearly put to you in two posts. Please put up or... stop posting your longwinded, intellectual, defenses of the indefensible. Please, answer my question... Still betting you can’t.
I must apologize for ‘shooting from the lip’. I inadvertently replied to the wrong post. I thought I was replying to a post by the one who started this thread, and who has not answered my questions about how he can call the Roman institution ‘the Church’ with the ‘right’ to interpret scripture for everyone. See my post quoted below.....
Whoa.. so your a Bible scholar! Any real Christian understands that the Old Testament Jews were ‘God’s people’ and therefore His ‘ekklasia’. Actually the Old Testament even refers to ‘the Church in the Wilderness’ (proof text on demand)
You are (may I say ‘typically’ for Roman apologists) dancing all around to answer the question I have now clearly put to you in two posts. Please put up or... stop posting your longwinded, intellectual, defenses of the indefensible. Please, answer my question... Still betting you can’t.
You are (may I say ‘typically’ for Roman apologists) dancing all around to answer the question I have now clearly put to you in two posts. Please put up or... stop posting your longwinded, intellectual, defenses of the indefensible. Please, answer my question... Still betting you can’t.
Are you sure this was addressed to me ?
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
UriÂ’el-2012 will certainly defend himself (he has no need of me), but I will be happy to proclaim, with a thunderous voice:
UriÂ’el-2012 is no Roman apologist... He is the farthest thing from it.