In context that “something” that someone decided was the “FINAL WORD” or “Gods word” was, obviously, a principle such as geocentricity, or a young Earth, or the fixity of species, and any other number of unwarranted assumptions based upon scriptural interpretation.
There being no conflict in my mind between Scripture (actually God's word) and science, when a conflict is perceived I assume it is my interpretation of scripture and not reality that is at fault.
Some people obviously take a different view.
But we know you reject the New Testament. That isn't the intellectual suicide that this discussion is about.
You said any time one considers something "G-d's word" one commits intellectual suicide.
In context that “something” that someone decided was the “FINAL WORD” or “Gods word” was, obviously, a principle such as geocentricity, or a young Earth, or the fixity of species, and any other number of unwarranted assumptions based upon scriptural interpretation.
You mean like the infancy and resurrection narratives? You need to wake up and read Raymond Brown, you primitive fundie you.
The "the impossible stuff I believe is okay, while the impossible stuff you believe is stupid" simply makes you look like an arrogant jackass.