[The Cajun]

I never have believed the Vatican’s official bit about the 3rd message.

Born and raised Catholic, (not so much anymore), I never did buy the church's reasoning of not revealing the third secret when told to do so. If the pope, at that time, really believed that it was the virgin, who was he or any mortal for that matter not to follow her orders to the letter.
Something happened I have no doubt, but what really happened is the question.

[Quix]

Yeah, I’ve always thought that, about that issue, too.

There’s been plenty of incongruencies along the way, as well as in the series of incidents originating the whole thing.

RC’s persistently challenge me with . . . how could satan cause a personage to advocate such ‘righteous’ things.

I’m not sure how righteous those exhortations were if they were not originating from Christ, Himself.

They just ended up causing millions of people to attach themselves all the more firmly to Mary vs to Christ.

And, there are vague to not so vague globalist implications in the messages, to begin with.

To me, the biggest import, is that it sets Mary up quite well to be presented yet again via the same critters and technologies . . . as a kind of Pied Piper to millions of RC’s at some critical END TIMES era point . . . leading the undiscerning down the yellow brick road to a horrible trap.

Thanks.

[metmom]

If the pope, at that time, really believed that it was the virgin, who was he or any mortal for that matter not to follow her orders to the letter.

Exactly.

That makes no sense.

[Alex Murphy]

....I never did buy the church's reasoning of not revealing the third secret when told to do so. If the pope, at that time, really believed that it was the virgin, who was he or any mortal for that matter not to follow her orders to the letter[?]

Related thread:
Is There Missing Text Of The Third Secret?