[Natural Law]

"That isn't the abbreviation you formerly used which was clearly offensive and gutter language not befitting the Religion Forum."

And neither is RC (arse).

[metmom]

*roll eyes*

Nobody else thinks along those lines. Why do you?

[Religion Moderator]

Thin skinned posters are the disruptors on "open" Religion Forum threads. They should ignore them altogether and instead post to threads labeled "caucus" "ecumenical" "prayer" or "devotional."

RC and OPC are initials. Reading something into the initials is attributing motive to the one using the initials, usually another Freeper and therefore "making it personal." Being offended by such initials is also "taking it personally" - being thin-skinned.

If you take offense at the term RC, then IGNORE the "open" RF threads altogether.

Also, terms such as Romanist and Snake-handlers - while being pejorative - are often used by both sides in articles, even historical documents or holy writ, which are subject to "open" RF town square type debate. Further, any language - e.g. potty language - disallowed on this forum must be disallowed on both sides of the debate. Therefore, I choose to allow the pejoratives on "open" RF threads.

Again, if you are offended by such terms, then IGNORE the "open" RF threads altogether.