Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Judith Anne; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; Godzilla; ...

I’m curious.

What does that straw dog do for y’all?

It’s an anacronistic absurdity in the communications exchange.

It’s akin to saying the sun is not up at midnight.

You know good and well that Prottys mean that the person has died to this time/space dimension—not eternally dead-cease-to-exist. You KNOW that. We KNOW that. What’s with this absurdity?

Incredible.


2,163 posted on 04/26/2010 7:38:48 PM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2115 | View Replies ]


To: Quix

I think part of the answer is that, no, we don’t know exactly what each individual non-Catholic means when he says the saints are dead.

Also just as the argument seems to take very seriously their death, so much so that they are placed beyond the reach of legitimate communication from those who have not shuffled off the mortal coil — OUR side takes their being alive, members of the body which is Christ and whose union and communion is made possible by the Holy Spirit, more seriously than their having ‘died.’

And there’s no particular reason why what, for shorthand, I;ll call your side, should be granted the right to dominate the terminology NOR for our side to assume that we know in detail the opinion of each individual disagreeing with us about the communion of the saints.

There is a certain kabuki quality to the exchange, but when we think the currently being alive of the saints is, so to speak, operative,while some who disagree with us think that their death is more important AND when these differences also touch on the highest sort of theology (God and time) and on eschatology, it is probably good to go through the “set piece” early exchanges in case something new is being brought to the table.

At least, that’s why ->I<- respond to someone saying, say, “Dominic is dead,” by saying he’s alive. Mary is, surprise surprise, a special case.

The accessibility and the “vitality” of the saints is, for us, a doctrinal matter (duh), and for some people a very real experience (however the ‘objective’ observer might consider that.) I know people who strike me as eminently sane and not the least bit flighty who claim strong and vital relationships, “Friendships” with one or more saints.

For them, I ask you to imagine that it’s like somebody saying “Joe is dead,” and responding, “How can that be? I was just talking with him.”


2,188 posted on 04/26/2010 8:15:13 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2163 | View Replies ]

To: Quix
You know good and well that Prottys mean that the person has died to this time/space dimension—not eternally dead-cease-to-exist. You KNOW that. We KNOW that. What’s with this absurdity?

How would I know what prottys mean? That would be mind reading, as you are doing in this post.

I believe the saints are alive. I do not see that Christ our Lord has prohibited us from asking for their intercession. I believe God is the Author of the time/space continuum and is above and beyond it. That is not absurd, unless you think God is absurd.

2,218 posted on 04/27/2010 2:25:10 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson