I’ve never even been threatened to be banned.
Then why are you unwilling to say the name?
I think you are pretty angry, and at the wrong person. You can look up Lutheran stuff (I am not a Lutheran) or other stuff if you want to.
What gives you the idea that I am angry at you? And what possibly gives you the idea that I don't like Lutherans?
‘What gives you the idea that I am angry at you? “
Stuff like:
“I’m jumping to conclusions? You had your kids posting under your name on FR?”
That’s accusatory. As though I was ringleader of some conspiracy.
“Who is the current leader of the Lutheran Church? Shall we have a microscopic look at his background? At Lutheran pastors? At Lutheran pastor child molesters? At Lutheran pastor homosexuals? At the Lutheran COVER-UP of this reprehensible abuse? Because YOU KNOW it took place, and yet WHERE IS THE SELF EXAMINATION?”
That’s accusatory. I actually and in fact do not know of any Lutheran clergy molesting a kid. I assume, just due to sheer numbers, that there have been.
“So, has this other account been banned? “
That’s accusatory. Why would my old account have been banned? I didn’t do anything wrong.
“Oh, really? How “riled up” are “most of you” about protestant or presbyterian child sexual abuse? You KNOW it takes place as often in other churches. Why do I never see you start one of those threads, and face the problems in your own church? “
That’s accusatory. There has never been such a scandal in my church. It is small, granted. And it is always possible. There are pervs on the prowl everywhere. But I can’t get riled up about something I don’t know about.
I could keep cutting and responding but you get the drift.