Then there is no moral wrong in considering one number more credible than another.
I am tied of those that use a platform of religion to influence those that mean to do us harm.
Williamson shouldn't have used his clerical position to make comments outside of what the Church teaches. Bishops should not be chemists, archeologists or Holocaust scholars, they have a more important job to do. That was what he did wrong. But the focus today is his conviction in Germany. That is absurd in terms of universal justice.
Accepting of what one source says is what is wrong with this country
By criminalizing opinions, the state of Germany has forced everyone -- even, as we learn, non-Germans -- to do just that.
Thanks