To: Dr. Eckleburg; Judith Anne
>>The infant Jesus did not save us by His merciful sacrifice on the cross. The man, Jesus Christ, the only “shepherd and bishop of our souls,” gave up His life for His sheep.<<
By that reasoning, the infant Jesus is a separate person from the one on the cross.
That’s odd.
To: netmilsmom
Statements like that are troubling, aren't they? I mean, is it a statement that a true follower of Christ would make? How is the infant Christ not the adult Christ? Think of how quickly our children become adults, who were once babes in arms...the young soldier sacrificing his life for the freedom of an oppressed people halfway around the globe -- to his mother and father is the same babe they watched take his first steps...a parent would know this. Someone who had never borne a child might be ignorant. Someone who thinks Mary and God are just concepts could not see that the infant Christ is the same Christ who died for our sins. Those of us with children know how foolish and cold the strange statement is.
To: netmilsmom
The infant Jesus' blood shed during His circumcision did not save anyone. His blood shed on the cross saved His sheep
The RCC practices a loony superstition which only confuses the Gospel message.
Repent.
349 posted on
04/17/2010 1:15:52 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: netmilsmom
“Thats odd.”
That tickled me, the way you said that.
389 posted on
04/18/2010 12:34:24 AM PDT by
dsc
(Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson