You have a “history of making personal remarks to others on the RF”
“No, I do not. If I did, I would have had many posts pulled, but I haven’t.”
That’s as bad as the rest of your logic.
“Your error stems from the fact that Roman Catholic apologists confuse criticism of a church, faith, practice or belief with personal criticisms of individual FReepers.”
I make no such error, no do I confuse those things.
“The former is permitted; the latter is forbidden.”
No, you’re allowed to say pretty much anything to a Catholic. The RM doesn’t seem to step in until a Catholic has said something he considers actionable.
“It took me a while to learn how to post within the rules.”
What you have learned is how to phrase a personal insult in such a way that the moderator lets you get away with it. This, combined with the preexisting bias, pretty much gives you carte blanche.
“It’s a much more civil method of discourse”
Your discourse is about as civil as the Katyn Forest massacre.
“and it actually improves your own debating skills.”
It’s amazing, yes, but it seems that you haven’t even noticed that everyone you’ve quarreled with has wiped the floor with you.
Go figure.
lol. Some days it seems the only thing Roman Catholic apologists can do is to assault other FReepers. The reasons for that are many, no doubt, not the least of which is that they obviously have no rebuttal to the topic of this thread — the egregious and unrepentant sins of its priestcraft.