Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law
"The Vatican has called the accusations "absolutely groundless" and said the facts were being misrepresented."

lol. Well that settles it. If Rome says something, we better darn well not challenge Rome.

Who needs evidence when we have Rome's double-secret assurance?

288 posted on 04/11/2010 11:02:34 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg
"Who needs evidence when we have Rome's double-secret assurance?"

This post perfectly summarizes your position and impeaches your voracity. Faced with mutually exclusive narratives automatically assume the Church and its clergy to be guilty and the exculpatory information to be false. I prefer to gather all of the information and weigh it thoroughly before concluding. I hold the credibility of the Vatican far above that of the various news agencies and my own objectivity well above that of the anti-Catholic menopausal dingbats that lurk and post in these threads.

310 posted on 04/12/2010 6:00:18 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson