Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Leoni

Of course not. Paul VI was the most liberal pope we have ever had. Like Louis XVI, he was a major player in his own tragedy. But we must take care in assigning blame. Look at the rejection of Humanae Vitae by virtually the whole Western Church. Look at the spread of liberation theology, the sudden collapse of traditionalist church such as in Quebec. At bottom, it was the victory of modernism.


28 posted on 04/09/2010 8:23:33 AM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
The difference between Paul VI and John Paul II, was that Paul VI had a bad publicist. John XXII, Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, ALL progressives. God chose them for some reason, I think to get the damage over and done with quicker. The Catholics that survive, will be only the hot Catholics, the lukewarm have fallen along with the cold. The people get they popes that they desire.
29 posted on 04/09/2010 7:00:15 PM PDT by Leoni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS

The people get the popes that they desire.


30 posted on 04/09/2010 7:02:40 PM PDT by Leoni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson