Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sten

If scaled into real life proportions, she would be 5 feet, 9 inches, (1.75 m) measuring 36-18-33. According to research by the University Central Hospital in Helsinki, Finland, she would lack the requisite 17 to 22 percent of body fat required to menstruate.
Source(s):
Lord, M.G. Forever Barbie: The Unauthorized Biography of a Real Doll. New York: William Morrow and Company,
Inc., 1994.

O’Sickey, Ingeborg Majer. “Barbie Magazine and the Aesthetic Commodification of Girls’ Bodies.” On Fashion. Ed. Shari Benstock and Suzanne Ferriss. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1994.


18 posted on 04/06/2010 7:55:10 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Hegewisch Dupa

the fact that she would have 36-18-33 measurements is freakin people out?

considering 36-24-34 would be ideal to many people. 6” on the waist? that’s the big deal?

then again, in America, 36-42-42 (or worse) would probably be more normal these days.

my guess, fatties are upset. tough beans. get off yer ass, go on a diet, and get some daily exercise. stop bitchin about a doll.


19 posted on 04/06/2010 8:18:38 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson