Well, if THAT'S the biggest point of contention with you - it shows you have studied NOTHING about the Shroud. that is the easiest debunker of all the debunk. Good grief.
Even the carbon dating - even though proven way off and myriad scientific tests prove the Shroud much older than the early carbon dating - puts the Shroud to hundreds of years BEFORE Leonardo (da Vinci) was even born.
Now, granted, Leonardo was a genius, but even HE was not THAT clever.
Might I humbly suggest that you might find it interesting to actually do some research on the decades of research that has been done? You might even learn something.
If I sound a little brittle, it's just that I've been studying and researching and corresponding with those who are experts on the Shroud, for 50 years. It's irritating to have people make such uninformed remarks, based not on even one of the thousands of pieces of scientific evidence - but on one - particularly the flimsiest - deliberate fallacy.
It puzzles me that so many who purport belief in Our Lord, are so disinterested that they don't bestir themselves to do any studying on the Shroud and then remark on the www, casting doubt that could affect countless others.You obviously have access to the Internet. No excuse for ignorance on the Shroud.
Okay okay already! Yes I was misinformed, I watched the show and I have no doubt the Shroud is real. I even now believe the Shroud was at Constantinople prior to being at Lirey, France. The Hungarian Pray Manuscript which shows the “L” shaped burn marks was fascinating.