Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
It is the refusal to take a charge seriously - or even a criminal conviction seriously

Please point out the criminal convictions in this case

69 posted on 03/25/2010 8:52:04 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard

From the BBC article mentioned in one of the first posts:

“The Rev Peter Hullermann had been accused of abusing boys in the 1970s when the now Pope approved his 1980 transfer to Munich to receive psychological treatment for paedophilia.

Hullermann was convicted in 1986 of abusing a youth, but stayed within the Church, serving as a village priest until 2008.”

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8587082.stm

The Pope’s idea of investigation includes:

“The letter states that the church’s jurisdiction ‘begins to run from the day when the minor has completed the 18th year of age’ and lasts for 10 years.

It orders that ‘preliminary investigations’ into any claims of abuse should be sent to Ratzinger’s office, which has the option of referring them back to private tribunals in which the ‘functions of judge, promoter of justice, notary and legal representative can validly be performed for these cases only by priests’.

‘Cases of this kind are subject to the pontifical secret,’ Ratzinger’s letter concludes. Breaching the pontifical secret at any time while the 10-year jurisdiction order is operating carries penalties, including the threat of excommunication.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/apr/24/children.childprotection


80 posted on 03/25/2010 9:08:43 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson