hosepipe sometimes points out that this means the atheists are under-evolved.
If being born again is a natural evolution of human persons, NOT being born again would be an under evolution... Which means Darwin(and others) had it right and wrong at the same time.. Evolution IS Possible.. but not exactly as with all species.. meaning Jesus taught evolution.. and animals did not evolve but morphed.. Animals morphed into other forms.. in some cases.. but did NOT evolve.. Like domestic cats and dogs.. which men not God made.. or morphed.. they did not evolve..
If some one born again, then, becomes an atheist would that be de-volving?.. or being UNborn-again?.. is it even possible to be UNborn-again?.. Or is being born again a metaphor and not an evolution?..
On the otherhand, you have four fingers and a thumb.. AND I wonder if human creatures are really certain selected "evil angels" that followed Satan in the beginning and are getting a second chance.. thru being tested as a human.. You know; a prodigal son redux.. but that's a wondering for another day I suppose..
Welcome to my sandbox... I don't build sand castles I prefer crashing toy trucks together.. while making crashing noises..