With this statement, it seems to me you deny on principle any value to human experience, especially as articulated in language, on grounds that human experience is always to be doubted as a source of knowledge, distrusted because it's "too personal," and thus cannot indicate a more general, let alone a universal rule.
If that is what you actually believe, dear kosta, I hardly know what to say to you in reply.
But I'll take a stab with this observation: You have to completely invert reality to accommodate such a conclusion.
Consider that statement for openers. Then maybe we'll see where it goes from there.
Dear betty, just saw your comment above in the “latest posts” list.
If human experience has no value, then nothing has any value, becuase there is nothing in objective reality that has any meaning apart from how humans can experience said reality; of course there is also the fact that God experiences objective reality; but we cannot know how He experiences reality other than by our own human experience; from our vantage point.
So to say that human experience has no value, is to say that nothing has any value at all, including that opinion that no human experience has any value! So it is a self-defeating piece of nothing.
As though reality only has value if completely apart from, and unknowable by, any human. Wow.
Nope, just stating that it is not reliable.