To: kosta50; betty boop; xzins; trisham; Alamo-Girl; Texas Songwriter; allmendream; P-Marlowe
It seems to me that people just have a "need" to make up things as they go along instead of just accepting what they don't know and leave it as what it is, a mystery free from qualifications or "explanations" based on fancy. As opposed to evo tales, like the Darwinian kind?
Made up as he went, while on a long sea voyage?
Why are you ponticating on morals. That's philosophical in nature. What scientific evidence do you have to back up your assertions about morality?
You know, anything testable, repeatable, concrete.
121 posted on
03/24/2010 3:27:19 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom; betty boop; xzins; trisham; Alamo-Girl; Texas Songwriter; allmendream; P-Marlowe
As opposed to evo tales, like the Darwinian kind? I believe I was addressing all types of people inclusing those who 'worship' science. You need to read the whole thing; not just cherry pick words to toss around.
125 posted on
03/24/2010 9:54:15 PM PDT by
kosta50
(The world is the way it is even if YOU don't understand it)
To: metmom; betty boop; xzins; trisham; Alamo-Girl; Texas Songwriter; allmendream; P-Marlowe
Why are you ponticating on morals. That's philosophical in nature. What scientific evidence do you have to back up your assertions about morality? You know, anything testable, repeatable, concrete. Yeah, like the Bible and God maybe? You have any good 'tests" for them? Something concrete, testable, and repeatable?
Anyway I am not 'ponticating' on morals. Morality exists outside theological pontifications.
126 posted on
03/24/2010 9:57:58 PM PDT by
kosta50
(The world is the way it is even if YOU don't understand it)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson