Now you may say eisegesis
But either way this author has taken a couple verses and read into it something that is not confirmed by any other scripture..as there is NO scripture that has Jesus giving anyone His power or His authority or His infallibility
The text you quote was ecclesiastical authority not the infallibility or authority of Christ as judge
You may not direct me when to say “eisegesis”, for you do not understand its derivation. There is no such word as “isogesis” and nothing in your links support your thesis.
In your first link, the author tries to say that the prependent “iso” means “isolate.” It does not. He confuses iso as derived from “isolate,” which is a word in the midst of other “iso-” words, but is unrelated to them. “Isolate” is Anglicization of the Latin word “insula” and has nothing to do with the meaning of the particle “iso” — which, as a PhD scientist, I recognize immediately denotes “equal to” or “homeo” = “same as” (throughout) as related to the postpended “-bar” or “-mer” or “-spondylus” or “-therm” and so forth. If there was such an invented term as isogenesis, it might mean “precisely translate,” not “precisely interpret.” Your point here is invalid.
On your second link, the offering is only a likewise misspelling of the word “eisegesis” (but giving an equivalent meaning associated with eisegesis), so it is not an authority for the existence of “isogesis” — another invalid assumption.
In your third link, the author cannot spell “symptomatic,” so why should he be able to spell “eisegesis”? He spells exegesis as “exogesis” also. No score here for your claim.
And the last link page does not display the character string “isogesis” anywhere, so it adds zero to your argument.
Furthermore, you claim, quite incorrectly:
“..as there is NO scripture that has Jesus giving anyone His power or His authority or His infallibility.”
In this you demean the investing of His disciples with His delegated authority that as they are going, they are to make disciples from (apo) all peoples (metonomy) by close individual personal supervision. They are to immerse these proven and tested committed disciples (not merely “converts” and most certainly not infants) in the name (by the authority of) The Father, (by the authority of) The Son, and (by the authority of) The Holy Ghost (as a proof of a good conscience, not as a means of salvation). They are then, by Christ’s command and under His authority, to publicly congregate the learners for didactical teaching as to how to keep watchfully secure and infallibly preserve all the commandments given by The Christ. Then doing this, they would be (invisibly) accompanied by Him, throughout the age.
And in doing so, they, and their disciples, may loose on earth which is already permitted to be loosed in The Heaven, and that they may have the power to bind on earth that which is already bound in The Heaven. Peter himself has been given the keys (the Gospel to be preached and believed) of the kingdom of heaven (the temporal kingdom containing both unregenerated and regenerated converts), that is, the earthly church; but Christ is the Door to the Kingdom of God, and is The Only One Who can and may admit or deny any human into that Kingdom.
The authority by which this is written is by the authority of the Word of The God, not “ecclesiastical.” This is correct exegesis, not eisegesis, and which authority is available to anyone who is a steward of the Father’s earthly estate, who exercises it exactly according to the commandment of Christ and the Will of Him Who sent The Savior to the fallen earthlings.
Do _your_ homework first.
(From a redeemed sinner, with the best of respect, hopefully not too pompous. Ecclesiastes 7:16-18)