Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ComeUpHigher; Religion Moderator

CUH - you may say that on a Caucus thread, but this is an OPEN thread. If confused you may need to re-read the RM’s policy statement


19 posted on 02/28/2010 6:37:33 PM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla; Religion Moderator

I wasn’t aware of the designation distinction. My post wast intended to be ecumenical as my topics distinction shows it under “Ecumenicism.” I would like the thread to be designated as such and would appreciate that postings be kept to the subject.

By copy of this post to the religion moderator, I would appreciate the designation being changed from “open” to “ecumnecial.” Thank you.


22 posted on 02/28/2010 6:57:11 PM PST by ComeUpHigher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Godzilla; ComeUpHigher; Religion Moderator; Admin Moderator

It is not OPEN this us an ecumentical thread

Ecumenic threads are closed to antagonism.

To antagonize is to incur or to provoke hostility in others.

Unlike the “caucus” threads, the article and reply posts of an “ecumenic” thread can discuss more than one belief, but antagonism is not tolerable.

More leeway is granted to what is acceptable in the text of the article than to the reply posts. For example, the term “gross error” in an article will not prevent an ecumenical discussion, but a poster should not use that term in his reply because it is antagonistic. As another example, the article might be a passage from the Bible which would be antagonistic to Jews. The passage should be considered historical fact and a legitimate subject for an ecumenic discussion. The reply posts however must not be antagonistic.

Contrasting of beliefs or even criticisms can be made without provoking hostilities. But when in doubt, only post what you are “for” and not what you are “against.” Or ask questions.

Ecumenical threads will be moderated on a “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” basis. When hostility has broken out on an “ecumenic” thread, I’ll be looking for the source.
Therefore “anti” posters must not try to finesse the guidelines by asking loaded questions, using inflammatory taglines, gratuitous quote mining or trying to slip in an “anti” or “ex” article under the color of the “ecumenic” tag.

Posters who try to tear down other’s beliefs or use subterfuge to accomplish the same goal are the disrupters on ecumenic threads and will be booted from the thread and/or suspended.


34 posted on 02/28/2010 11:25:59 PM PST by restornu (FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS NOTHING TO SHARE -- BUT DEBT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson