[Forest Keeper]

It seems to me that ‘hyper-Calvinism’ is just Calvinism logically carried out.

Just to be clear, we consider hyper-Calvinism to be anti-Calvinism since it violates scripture right and left. Logical implications can be fine (such as double predestination), but not when they contradict God's word. For example, a hyper-Calvinist might say that witnessing is a waste of time, but we know that witnessing is commanded by God, therefore, it cannot be a waste of time.

[ShadowAce]

Logical implications can be fine (such as double predestination), but not when they contradict God's word.

Are you saying that God, or God's Word, is not logical?

And no, I'm not talking the "spiritual man" vs. "natural man" stuff. I'm talking rules of logic.