Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wetickel; Houghton M.

Hi Houghton, just becuase I post something from Macarthur does not mean I agree with his every word. I already disagree with his eschatology for one thing, and his views on several other matters...

But from what I do know about these 20th Century thinkers, while they themselves may not have been out and out subjectivie/existential whatevers—I believe their theological deviations from Scripture, however *slight* did plant the SEEDS for such ideas to eventually gain steam throughout the century...

It does not mean that those men were not really believers or something. Merely that their ideas are flawed. Some of Macarthur’s are too—but that doesn’t mean his criticisms don’t have some semblance of validity.


14 posted on 02/25/2010 2:03:11 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege ("When I survey the wondrous cross...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: CondoleezzaProtege
Methinks the "baby" goes out with the bathwater anytime someone defends sola scriptura. Some others are clearly unable to read past that point regardless of the scholarship or point of the writer. It's a shame, really!

Thanks for the post, I "got" it. :o)

17 posted on 02/25/2010 3:15:57 PM PST by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson