No, your point was to adhear all those variants as = false material. Scholars are able to go to the extant ms for the Bible.
Where are all the prophetic statements or announcements for the 4000+ changes to the bom - when the translation process by lds' own history was literal word-for-word and to a point letter-for-letter.
Would I be correct in saying that you reverence the Bible inspite of all these well known errors?
thousands of errors over tens of thousands of ms resulting in <1% of the bible having any question as origional text - Stack that up against your book of abraham some time.
Oh snap!
thousands of errors over tens of thousands of ms resulting in <1% of the bible having any question as origional text
I'll take that as a yes. Perhaps we'll get a response from svcw at some point. :-)